Long Beach gear
Long Beach gear
That long beach is hard on gear
- Attachments
-
- IMG_3325.JPG (753.67 KiB) Viewed 2813 times
Thinking is over rated- Homer Simpson
- winddoctor
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 8:57 am
- Location: Near Kook st.
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 20 times
I wonder if carbon bases, especially longer ones, flex enough that they don't bend/kink/snap like aluminum ones. Aluminum booms are brutal for breakage. Carbon is the way (initial $$$$$ hit but over long run possibly cheaper).C36 wrote:Sorry to see the damage.
On the bright side if the base was carbon it likely would have broken resulting in rig/board separation (and potentially more sail/mast damage in the shore break) and better the tail broke as it is cheaper to replace than the arms.
Poultry in motion
- winddoctor
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 8:57 am
- Location: Near Kook st.
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 20 times
- C36
- Website Donor
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:27 pm
- Location: Burnaby, BC
- Been thanked: 1 time
C36 wrote:Sorry to see the damage.
On the bright side if the base was carbon it likely would have broken resulting in rig/board separation (and potentially more sail/mast damage in the shore break) and better the tail broke as it is cheaper to replace than the arms.
I thought the same thing, until I saw three extensions crushed in the waves, all carbon. I have seen aluminum extensions bend (like Gwind's, but haven't seen any break). As for carbon booms - Ben did two last summer and Chris Klohn warranted three from memory (big guy snapped them doing forwards).winddoctor wrote:I wonder if carbon bases, especially longer ones, flex enough that they don't bend/kink/snap like aluminum ones. Aluminum booms are brutal for breakage. Carbon is the way (initial $$$$$ hit but over long run possibly cheaper).
edit: Heard that Chinook warranted the boom. Hope that happened.